Thursday, October 14, 2010
THIS IS THE REASON WHY WE DON'T GET PERSONAL ON SOCIAL NETWORKS!! AND YOU SHOULDN'T EITHER!!
THIS VIDEO WILL SHOW YOU WHO IS REALLY WATCHING US!! AND IT ONLY MAKE YOU ASK... WHY?
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
THE SARGONITES LIVE THIS SATURDAY OCT, 16 AT KARMA LOUNGE NYC FOR "TRI-STATE OF MIND"!!
| Time | Saturday, October 16 · 6:30pm - 10:30pm |
|---|---|
| Location | KARMA LOUNGE 51 1ST AVE. New York, NY |
| TRI-STATE OF MIND IS BACK FOLKS..... HIP HOP FORUM & INDY SPIN ... BRING YOUR OWN MUSIC FOR THE DJ TO PLAY AND BE READY FOR THE RESPONSE... LIVE PERFORMANCES BY: CHILO CAVALIER AUTHENTIC THE SARGONITES PLUS AN OPEN MIC & THE INDY SPIN....WHERE THE DJ PLAYS YOUR MUSIC.... DOORS OPEN 6:30 21& OVER $5 COVER | |
Monday, October 11, 2010
Friday, October 8, 2010
THE FEDS! THE FEDS! WHATCHA GONNA DOOO? WHATCHA GONNA DOOO? WHEN THEY COME FOR YOU!
Who the FUCk the FEDS think they are? Getting caught breaking laws and trying to get away with it!
People.....please read THIS and then gather what's going on!!
By Wilson Rothman
msnbc.com msnbc.com
updated 49 minutes ago 2010-10-08T22:36:11
Several days ago a 20-year-old student discovered a GPS tracking device hidden on his car. After his friend posted a picture of it online, speculating about its ties to a secret FBI investigation, the feds themselves came a-knockin', according to Wired.com. They wanted their toy back.
Based on the discussion with the six FBI agents who arrived at his doorstep, Yassir Afifi believes he'd been under surveillance for three to six months. When Wired asked an FBI spokesman about the case, he did not acknowledge ownership of the device, but said that there was an "ongoing investigation."
Afifi says that he cooperated with the FBI and, according to Wired, "did nothing to merit attention from authorities." He is a U.S. citizen who lives in Santa Clara, Calif., where he attends Mission College.
Afifi's father, an Islamic-American activist, died a year ago in Egypt. It is not clear what the circumstances of his death were, or if this was the reason for the FBI's investigation of Afifi.
The gadget itself — a GPS receiver identified as a police-issue-only Cobham Orion Guardian ST820 tracking system, connected to a battery pack and radio transmitter — was magnetically attached to the car. A shot of it made its way around the blogosphere on Monday, after appearing on the community news site Reddit. After Afifi spotted an antenna sticking out during an oil change, the garage owner offered to yank it out. It apparently popped off quite easily.
The question of whether or not sticking a GPS on a car is legal is actually in the middle of a hot debate right now. One federal court recently said that it was legal, while another said that tracking for an "extended period of time" would in fact require a warrant. (For more on this, here's a great piece in Time written by lawyer and tech journalist Adam Cohen.)
Legality aside, the tactic itself might have been carried out with something less than precision. Simply put, tracking devices shouldn't be so easy to find. Wired talked to an agent who said that not only is the tracking device out of date, but state-of-the-art snoops hardwire the stuff directly to the car's electrical system, avoiding the need for a battery.
What's impressive is how quickly Afifi got an identification of the gadget by crowdsourcing it on the Web. On the flipside, that kind of exposure isn't good PR for the FBI. Surely the revelation of the magnetic tracker will cause many people to check under their own cars. Like many noble efforts to keep us safe from terrorism, this one may be turning out to not be so effective. After all, those who already know they're involved in illegal activity probably check their cars every day, rain or shine.
This piece originally appeared on Technolog. For more details on the Afifi story, read the report at Wired.com.
© 2010 msnbc.com Reprints
People.....please read THIS and then gather what's going on!!
By Wilson Rothman
msnbc.com msnbc.com
updated 49 minutes ago 2010-10-08T22:36:11
Several days ago a 20-year-old student discovered a GPS tracking device hidden on his car. After his friend posted a picture of it online, speculating about its ties to a secret FBI investigation, the feds themselves came a-knockin', according to Wired.com. They wanted their toy back.
Based on the discussion with the six FBI agents who arrived at his doorstep, Yassir Afifi believes he'd been under surveillance for three to six months. When Wired asked an FBI spokesman about the case, he did not acknowledge ownership of the device, but said that there was an "ongoing investigation."
Afifi says that he cooperated with the FBI and, according to Wired, "did nothing to merit attention from authorities." He is a U.S. citizen who lives in Santa Clara, Calif., where he attends Mission College.
Afifi's father, an Islamic-American activist, died a year ago in Egypt. It is not clear what the circumstances of his death were, or if this was the reason for the FBI's investigation of Afifi.
The gadget itself — a GPS receiver identified as a police-issue-only Cobham Orion Guardian ST820 tracking system, connected to a battery pack and radio transmitter — was magnetically attached to the car. A shot of it made its way around the blogosphere on Monday, after appearing on the community news site Reddit. After Afifi spotted an antenna sticking out during an oil change, the garage owner offered to yank it out. It apparently popped off quite easily.
The question of whether or not sticking a GPS on a car is legal is actually in the middle of a hot debate right now. One federal court recently said that it was legal, while another said that tracking for an "extended period of time" would in fact require a warrant. (For more on this, here's a great piece in Time written by lawyer and tech journalist Adam Cohen.)
Legality aside, the tactic itself might have been carried out with something less than precision. Simply put, tracking devices shouldn't be so easy to find. Wired talked to an agent who said that not only is the tracking device out of date, but state-of-the-art snoops hardwire the stuff directly to the car's electrical system, avoiding the need for a battery.
What's impressive is how quickly Afifi got an identification of the gadget by crowdsourcing it on the Web. On the flipside, that kind of exposure isn't good PR for the FBI. Surely the revelation of the magnetic tracker will cause many people to check under their own cars. Like many noble efforts to keep us safe from terrorism, this one may be turning out to not be so effective. After all, those who already know they're involved in illegal activity probably check their cars every day, rain or shine.
This piece originally appeared on Technolog. For more details on the Afifi story, read the report at Wired.com.
© 2010 msnbc.com Reprints
THE SARGONITES LIVE OCT 23RD IN PHILLY!
THEY CAN TRY TO PUT BORDERS AROUND THE LAND BUT THEY CANT BUT BORDERS AROUND HIP HOP ... IT IS AN UNSTOPPABLE FORCE LOVED BY THE PEOPLE. "ON OCT 23 IN PHILLY AT KICIO HIP HOP AND GUERRILLA REPUBLIK PRESENTS " HIP HOP SIN FRONTERAS , HIP HOP WITH OUT BORDERS" .
PERFORM...ING LIVE : BOCAFLOJA = MEXICO
REYES DEL BAJAO MUNDO = EL SALVADOR
IZ THE TRUTH= PERU
MC KACIO = MEXICO
THE SARGONITES = DOMINCAN REPUBLIK
MARCEL CARTIER = GERMANY, NYC
GERONIMO= MEXICO
ALSO ON THE TURN TABLES DJ SOULBUCK, DJ KEWELLE TANZANIA = SOUTH AFRICA MUJADO AND DREWN.. .
AT 1650 RIDGE AVE FROM 5PM TILL 12 AT NIGHT ...LET THE ELEMENTS OF HIP HOP RISE!! 5$$ FOR THE PEOPLE...ONLY THE REALIST FEEL THIS!!
Thursday, October 7, 2010
REAL HIP HOP LISTENERS ARE DOWNLOADING "WE ARE" FROM THE SARGONITES!
"WE ARE" IS A CLASSIC SONG OFF THE SARGONITES ALBUM "SONSOFDASUN"... AVAILABLE FOR FREE DOWNLOADS AT THE STORE! OR CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO EXPERIENCE REAL HIP HOP!
CLICK HERE ------> http://myspace.com/thesargonites
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
THE REBEL COALITION LIVE IN PHILLY SEPT 30!!
9/30/10 in Philly come check out the..Rebel Coalition-godHead The General, Magnum O, The Sargonites, SoundBwoi Killaz, Divine Wize,T.H.E, DJ SoulBuck! All together live at The Gathering @ The Rotunda in Philadelphia!!
|
NEW CYBERSECURITY BILL GIVES OBAMA POWER TO SHUT DOWN COMPANIES!
Paul Joseph Watson
September 28, 2010
An amalgamated cybersecurity bill that lawmakers hope to pass before the end of the year includes new powers which would allow President Obama to shut down not only entire areas of the Internet, but also businesses and industries that fail to comply with government orders following the declaration of a national emergency – increasing fears that the legislation will be abused as a political tool.
The draft bill is a combination of two pieces of legislation originally crafted by Senators Lieberman and Rockefeller. One of the differences between the new bill and the original Lieberman version is that the Internet “kill switch” power has been limited to 90 days without congressional oversight, rather than the original period of four months contained in the Lieberman bill.
In other words, President Obama can issue an emergency declaration that lasts 30 days and he can renew it for a further 60 days before congress can step in to oversee the powers.
The new powers would give Obama a free hand to not only shut down entire areas of the Internet and block all Internet traffic from certain countries, but under the amalgamated bill he would also have the power to completely shut down industries that don’t follow government orders, according to a Reuters summary of the new bill.
“Industries, companies or portions of companies could be temporarily shut down, or be required to take other steps to address threats,” states the report, citing concerns about an “imminent threat to the U.S. electrical grid or other critical infrastructure such as the water supply or financial network.”
The only protection afforded to companies under the new laws is that they would have to be defined as “critical” in order to come under government regulation, but since the government itself would decide to what companies this label applies, it’s hardly a comforting layer of security.
“Even in the absence of an imminent threat, companies could face government scrutiny. Company employees working in cybersecurity would need appropriate skills. It also would require companies to report cyber threats to the government, and to have plans for responding to a cyber attack,” states the report.
As we have highlighted, the threat from cyber-terrorists to the U.S. power grid or water supply is minimal. The perpetrators of an attack on such infrastructure would have to have direct physical access to the systems that operate these plants to cause any damage. The recent Stuxnet malware attack, for example, was introduced and spread through a physical USB device, not via the public Internet.
Any perceived threat from the public Internet to these systems is therefore completely contrived and strips bare what many fear is the real agenda behind cybersecurity – to enable the government to regulate free speech on the Internet.
Handing Obama the power to shut down certain companies or businesses is likely to heighten already existing fears that the new cybersecurity federal bureaucracy could be used as a political tool.
As we reported back in March, the Obama administration’s release of the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative, a government plan to “secure” (or control) the nation’s public and private sector computer networks, coincided with Democrats attempting to claim that the independent news website The Drudge Report was serving malware, an incident Senator Jim Inhofe described as a deliberate ploy “to discourage people from using Drudge”.
Senator Joe Lieberman appeared to admit that the legislation had more to do with simply protecting US infrastructure when he told CNN’s Candy Crowley that the bill was intended to mimic the Communist Chinese system of Internet policing.
“Right now China, the government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too,” said Lieberman.
As we have documented, the Chinese government does not disconnect parts of the Internet because of genuine security concerns, it habitually does so only to oppress and silence victims of government abuse and atrocities, and to strangle dissent against the state, a practice many fear is the ultimate intention of cybersecurity in the United States.
The implementation of the cybersecurity apparatus would represent another huge expansion of the federal government, creating an Office of Cyber Policy within the executive branch and also “A new National Center for Cybersecurity and Communications (NCCC) within the Department of Homeland Security, led by a separate director who would enforce cybersecurity policies throughout the government and the private sector.”
Lawmakers have indicated that they intend to push through the bill before the end of the year, though with Congress set to leave Friday amidst deadlock on a number of issues, cybersecurity looks like it will have to wait until mid-November, providing its opponents with extra time to point out the inherent threats the legislation poses to free speech and free enterprise.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson has been interviewed by many publications and radio shows, including Vanity Fair and Coast to Coast AM, America’s most listened to late night talk show.
Not once had this report hit the media like it should, and if it does?
Then, the people should get the chance to be fully informed about the pros and cons of this new bill, and provide feed back as well.
Tyranny in this country, has to END!!
September 28, 2010
An amalgamated cybersecurity bill that lawmakers hope to pass before the end of the year includes new powers which would allow President Obama to shut down not only entire areas of the Internet, but also businesses and industries that fail to comply with government orders following the declaration of a national emergency – increasing fears that the legislation will be abused as a political tool.
The draft bill is a combination of two pieces of legislation originally crafted by Senators Lieberman and Rockefeller. One of the differences between the new bill and the original Lieberman version is that the Internet “kill switch” power has been limited to 90 days without congressional oversight, rather than the original period of four months contained in the Lieberman bill.
In other words, President Obama can issue an emergency declaration that lasts 30 days and he can renew it for a further 60 days before congress can step in to oversee the powers.
The new powers would give Obama a free hand to not only shut down entire areas of the Internet and block all Internet traffic from certain countries, but under the amalgamated bill he would also have the power to completely shut down industries that don’t follow government orders, according to a Reuters summary of the new bill.
“Industries, companies or portions of companies could be temporarily shut down, or be required to take other steps to address threats,” states the report, citing concerns about an “imminent threat to the U.S. electrical grid or other critical infrastructure such as the water supply or financial network.”
The only protection afforded to companies under the new laws is that they would have to be defined as “critical” in order to come under government regulation, but since the government itself would decide to what companies this label applies, it’s hardly a comforting layer of security.
“Even in the absence of an imminent threat, companies could face government scrutiny. Company employees working in cybersecurity would need appropriate skills. It also would require companies to report cyber threats to the government, and to have plans for responding to a cyber attack,” states the report.
As we have highlighted, the threat from cyber-terrorists to the U.S. power grid or water supply is minimal. The perpetrators of an attack on such infrastructure would have to have direct physical access to the systems that operate these plants to cause any damage. The recent Stuxnet malware attack, for example, was introduced and spread through a physical USB device, not via the public Internet.
Any perceived threat from the public Internet to these systems is therefore completely contrived and strips bare what many fear is the real agenda behind cybersecurity – to enable the government to regulate free speech on the Internet.
Handing Obama the power to shut down certain companies or businesses is likely to heighten already existing fears that the new cybersecurity federal bureaucracy could be used as a political tool.
As we reported back in March, the Obama administration’s release of the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative, a government plan to “secure” (or control) the nation’s public and private sector computer networks, coincided with Democrats attempting to claim that the independent news website The Drudge Report was serving malware, an incident Senator Jim Inhofe described as a deliberate ploy “to discourage people from using Drudge”.
Senator Joe Lieberman appeared to admit that the legislation had more to do with simply protecting US infrastructure when he told CNN’s Candy Crowley that the bill was intended to mimic the Communist Chinese system of Internet policing.
“Right now China, the government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too,” said Lieberman.
As we have documented, the Chinese government does not disconnect parts of the Internet because of genuine security concerns, it habitually does so only to oppress and silence victims of government abuse and atrocities, and to strangle dissent against the state, a practice many fear is the ultimate intention of cybersecurity in the United States.
The implementation of the cybersecurity apparatus would represent another huge expansion of the federal government, creating an Office of Cyber Policy within the executive branch and also “A new National Center for Cybersecurity and Communications (NCCC) within the Department of Homeland Security, led by a separate director who would enforce cybersecurity policies throughout the government and the private sector.”
Lawmakers have indicated that they intend to push through the bill before the end of the year, though with Congress set to leave Friday amidst deadlock on a number of issues, cybersecurity looks like it will have to wait until mid-November, providing its opponents with extra time to point out the inherent threats the legislation poses to free speech and free enterprise.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson has been interviewed by many publications and radio shows, including Vanity Fair and Coast to Coast AM, America’s most listened to late night talk show.
Not once had this report hit the media like it should, and if it does?
Then, the people should get the chance to be fully informed about the pros and cons of this new bill, and provide feed back as well.
Tyranny in this country, has to END!!
Thursday, September 16, 2010
AFFORDABLE HIGH QUALITY VIDEO PRODUCTION!
The Sargonites usually get asked pretty often, "Who does your videos?" and the answer to that would be.....Morbius!
Apart from being behind the boards at the recording studio, Morbius manages to capture the moments behind the cameras as well. Filming has been a part of him since his early childhood days as it was for most reknowned directors in the industry today. Since then, his video production expertise through trial and error allowed him to perfect a young directors obvious learning set backs, while increasing his creative strengths. Thus, gained him respect and recongnition from several fellow independent artists, who currently have him lined up with project after project because of his gifted insight behind filming.
Film production can be quite costly due to many variables such as location, lighting, camera quality, 3D animation, added effects, editing, directing, green screening, plus much more! which is why for this reason many indie artists either minimize or don't even include videos as a selling point for themselves. On the average to have a complete music video done independently would typically include: A days shoot with four takes, filmed at one location, a camera, lighting and additonal background props (smoke machine, a car or a motorcycle etc.,) all adds up to a price of $2,000. Now, of course with some added locations, effects and more days to shoot, then it ranges from $5,000 to $10,000. Major labels usually spend on the average of about $15,000 to even $150,000. Numbers such as these for an independent artist (especially for one who is starting out) do not become appealing nor even encouraging to go ahead and get a music video done.
So, why is it that independent artists are headed towards Morbius's direction?
Film production can be quite costly due to many variables such as location, lighting, camera quality, 3D animation, added effects, editing, directing, green screening, plus much more! which is why for this reason many indie artists either minimize or don't even include videos as a selling point for themselves. On the average to have a complete music video done independently would typically include: A days shoot with four takes, filmed at one location, a camera, lighting and additonal background props (smoke machine, a car or a motorcycle etc.,) all adds up to a price of $2,000. Now, of course with some added locations, effects and more days to shoot, then it ranges from $5,000 to $10,000. Major labels usually spend on the average of about $15,000 to even $150,000. Numbers such as these for an independent artist (especially for one who is starting out) do not become appealing nor even encouraging to go ahead and get a music video done.
So, why is it that independent artists are headed towards Morbius's direction?
That's because Morbius provides a one complete video package that consists of: Directing, editing lighting and filming equipment (which includes eye catching transitional effects with color correction on high-end editing software for the final production), films on several interior and exterior location sites, suggestive scripted storyline, filmed on a HD camera, shoots WAY over four takes and all in one days shoot for: $350!
if you want to shoot with the higher quality HDV Sony camera it's: $600
and for a quick release Video Promo: $150!
It's also $100 for everyday extra we have to shoot!
That's an incredible 85% in savings from the typical independent video cost! Making it truly an affordable high quality video production that give's great results, both on screen and on the wallet!
Here's a sample of Morbius's works:
if you want to shoot with the higher quality HDV Sony camera it's: $600
and for a quick release Video Promo: $150!
It's also $100 for everyday extra we have to shoot!
That's an incredible 85% in savings from the typical independent video cost! Making it truly an affordable high quality video production that give's great results, both on screen and on the wallet!
Here's a sample of Morbius's works:
His latest videos!
To find out more about affordable video production:
STOP WAITING & INQUIRE TODAY!
Contact us at: Bookthesargonites@gmail.com
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
